From: Eric Tanter (etanter at dcc.uchile.cl) Date: Sun Oct 23 17:14:50 EDT 2011 |
|
On Oct 23, 2011, at 5:39 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > Yes, I have planned to do this for a while. Probably the form it will > take will be a macro that always produces a type error when checked, > rather than a new type. Then macros could use this form to ensure > exhaustiveness. Great! Looking forward to that! Thanks, -- Éric
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|