[racket] check-fact would be nice...

From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Thu Oct 13 20:33:48 EDT 2011

In full Racket, use rackunit and it has all these goodies. 

For *SL, I prefer it if students spell it all out. It is trivial to indoctrinate every single student
with a test is only a test if it consists of an expression and an expected value. 

On Oct 13, 2011, at 7:43 PM, Adam Shaw wrote:

> Forgive me if the following already exists in Racket, but I would appreciate if something like
> (check-fact <bool-exp>)
> (or check-pred, check-truth, whatever) as an alternative to
> (check-expect <bool-exp> true)
> Seems like it would be a reasonable addition.
> Cheers - Adam
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20111013/a40ed05b/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.