From: Mark Engelberg (mark.engelberg at gmail.com) Date: Wed Nov 16 14:22:32 EST 2011 |
|
I frequently find myself wishing that you could use internal definitions in cond without introducing additional indentation, for example something like: (define (fun-for-list l) (cond [(empty? l) ...] (define fst (first l)) [(even? fst) ...] [(odd? fst) ...])) rather than (define (fun-for-list l) (cond [(empty? l) ...] [else (define fst (first l)) (cond [(even? fst) ...] [(odd? fst) ...])]))
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|