[racket] DrRacket needs work

> having said that, "eminently sensible" is in the eye of the beholder.
> after all, racket didn't have static type checking for most of its
> life, no? i am not saying it is or is not eminent in my own view, i am
> pointing out that it is pretty subjective so you can't actually call
> it "eminently sensible" since to some people it might actually be
> eminently a pain in the ass.

This is a pretty poor example to illustrate your point, because Racket
still does not have static type checking.

Shriram