[racket] I've implemented a Scheme Interpreter. But it's too slow. Next step?
David Kranz's dissertation has a lot of interesting material about
implementing closures efficiently.
http://repository.readscheme.org/ftp/papers/orbit-thesis.pdf
Andrew Appel's book Compiling with Continuations also covers similar
material.
Vincent
At Mon, 21 Mar 2011 12:42:07 -0400,
Patrick Li wrote:
>
> [1 <multipart/alternative (7bit)>]
> [1.1 <text/plain; ISO-8859-1 (7bit)>]
> Hello everyone,
>
> For educational purposes, I've implemented a simple Scheme interpreter in C,
> but it's way too slow at the moment. (eg. just macroexpanding and evaluating
> a function definition takes a few seconds.) I would like some advice on how
> to proceed next to get a adequately performing Scheme system.
>
> My goal is simply to get out of C as quickly as possible. ie. Get the basic
> forms and a macro system working which will allow me to write the rest of it
> in Scheme.
>
> So far this is what I have done:
>
> I wrote a simple Scheme interpreter in Scheme in continuation-passing style,
> so that I can get call/cc working.
>
> Then I basically just manually translated that code into C. So all
> continuations are heap allocated.
>
> How should I proceed from here? These are the options that I've come up
> with:
>
> (1) Optimize variable lookup. Currently the environment is represented as a
> list of key-value pairs. Variable lookup is done by searching through the
> list.
>
> (2) "Analyze" the code before evaluating it (ie. as in SICP). Ie. for an
> (if) form, it will determine that it is an if form during the analysis
> phase, so that at execution stage it won't have to repeatedly figure out
> what sort of form it is.
>
> (3) Write a very simple VM, and develop a simple byte-code compiler. The
> problem here is that I don't really know how to deal with first-class
> continuations.
>
> Thanks for your help
> -Patrick
> [1.2 <text/html; ISO-8859-1 (quoted-printable)>]
>
> [2 <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
> _________________________________________________
> For list-related administrative tasks:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users