[racket] stream-cons from racket/stream isn't lazy

Two minutes ago, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> 
> On Mar 5, 2011, at 10:32 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 
> > So you shouldn't use it at all.
> 
> Eli, this remark suggests that 'stream' is mis-documented

I think that a comment at the top of the documentation is what was
missing.


> and that it should be moved somewhere else for the next release,
> before it does more harm (a /private/) -- Matthias

(I suggested this too, but I think that the general wind was to avoid
dropping it.)

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!