[racket] what kind of Racket editor operations would you like to see?

From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt (samth at ccs.neu.edu)
Date: Sat Jul 16 11:16:53 EDT 2011

I think the big difference, as someone who currently uses Check Syntax a
lot, is that Peter is asking for refactoring that reaches to other files.
Perhaps the right way to integrate this is via the module browser.

On Jul 16, 2011 10:06 AM, "Robby Findler" <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>
wrote:
>
> I realize that Check Syntax requires some setup time, but speaking
> purely in terms of functionality, is that getting at what you want?
>
> Robby
>
> 2011/7/16 Ivanyi Peter <pivanyi at freemail.hu>:
> >  Markku Rontu <markku.rontu at iki.fi>, ezt írta:
> >> A wish list, well I'd like "extract function" refactoring and more
advanced
> >> renaming than search & replace. Also would be nice to be able to have
> >> visibility to all defined modules, requires, provides, functions,
classes,
> >> structs etc. in a whole project and quick navigation within it.
> >
> > I also would like to vote for these.
> > - E.g. Replacing a function name with any other name at
> >  every place where it can be "meaningfully" determined that
> >  it is the same function name.
> > - Project view. Yes, please.
> >
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Peter Ivanyi
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________
> >  For list-related administrative tasks:
> >  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
> >
>
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20110716/41aee1bb/attachment.html>

Posted on the users mailing list.