[racket] tests/eli-tester feedback (Was: Racket unit testing)

40 minutes ago, Stephen Bloch wrote:
> 
> On Feb 14, 2011, at 5:00 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 
> > I figured that
> > a much better solution to avoid some new `/=>' is to have instead a
> > new `true' so that (test E => true) works for any non-#f value.
> 
> Umm... isn't redefining "true" sorta like redefining pi to equal 3?

No.


-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!