| From: Joe Marshall (jmarshall at alum.mit.edu) Date: Mon Feb 14 17:01:57 EST 2011 |
|
My point was that inexactness leads to a lot of nasty incoherence. But in the spirit of asking naive questions... On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 12:14 PM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt <samth at ccs.neu.edu> wrote: > No, it's not a bug. Since 1e100 is an inexact number, there's > uncertainty about the minimum of those two numbers, So could a conforming implementation return 1e100 as the answer? (min 0 1e100) => 1e100 -- ~jrm
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}