[racket] Multiplying by 0

From: Gregory Woodhouse (gregwoodhouse at me.com)
Date: Mon Feb 14 15:09:04 EST 2011

Oops... Now that has to qualify as a bug.

On Feb 14, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Joe Marshall wrote:

> 2011/2/13 José Lopes <jose.lopes at ist.utl.pt>:
>> I understand. However, not only that disregards type promotion but also is
>> incoherent since (+ 0 0.0) evaluates to 0.0.
> 
> Worse:
> (min 0 1e100) => 0.0
> 
> -- 
> ~jrm



Posted on the users mailing list.