From: Gregory Woodhouse (gregwoodhouse at me.com) Date: Mon Feb 14 15:09:04 EST 2011 |
|
Oops... Now that has to qualify as a bug. On Feb 14, 2011, at 11:58 AM, Joe Marshall wrote: > 2011/2/13 José Lopes <jose.lopes at ist.utl.pt>: >> I understand. However, not only that disregards type promotion but also is >> incoherent since (+ 0 0.0) evaluates to 0.0. > > Worse: > (min 0 1e100) => 0.0 > > -- > ~jrm
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|