[racket] For new Racket users

Whoops, sorry: I meant 'in-string' (and then just print the result).

Robby

On Sun, Aug 28, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Stephen Chang <stchang at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>> You can also use for/string to make a pretty compact version.
>
> I was trying to find something like that but it doesnt seem to exist?
> I had to use string-map from srfi/13
>
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/search/index.html?q=for/string
>