From: Sam Tobin-Hochstadt (samth at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Mon Aug 22 07:32:01 EDT 2011 |
|
On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 9:40 PM, Norman Gray <norman at astro.gla.ac.uk> wrote: > date->seconds has a sort of core-ish feel." That's correct. There are two problems here: first, `date->seconds' is missing a type, along with most of the rest of the `racket/date' library. Second, there's a bug in Typed Racket that causes the error you saw. I hope to fix both shortly. -- sam th samth at ccs.neu.edu
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|