[racket] define-syntax-rule/id

On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:52, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:

> Yesterday, Jon Rafkind wrote:
> >
> > This is mostly straight-forward except that to get the right lexical
> > scope for `get-x1' we need to do a little hack (by assuming the
> > argument list has at least one thing in it). Of course the original
> > macro could enforce such a property as well.
>
> Why not use `stx' directly?
>
>
Could you elaborate? `stx' in the docs does not look relevant.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20110419/d69128e0/attachment.html>