[racket] require url?
About a minute ago, Eli Barzilay wrote:
> 5 hours ago, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> > Eli Barzilay wrote at 04/09/2011 12:12 AM:
> > > There is a good solution for this that I recently saw -- the way that
> > > chrome extensions are distributed. The summary of what I understand
> > > from it is: an extension is a zip file with a prefix holding two
> > > things -- a public key for the extension, and a signature for the zip
> > > file that was done using the private key.
> >
> > Isn't this just old-fashioned code signing. I think people talked about
> > it for PLaneT multiple times in the past, before Chrome existed. Or am
> > I misunderstanding?
>
> I don't know wearher it's old-fashioned or not, butthe thing thatI've
> never seen before is using a single key per package and trusting itfor
> further updates -- which is very different from the usual key per
> person that requires trusting the channel you're getting it through.
Oh, and I don't remember any concrete planet suggestions on this.
--
((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x))) Eli Barzilay:
http://barzilay.org/ Maze is Life!