[racket] [REMINDER] Boston Lisp Meeting: Monday 2010-09-20 Hari Prashanth on Functional Data Structures for Typed Racket

On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 9:12 AM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu> wrote:
> Well, I agree that the sentence is misleading. It is not at all clear
> (at least to this reader) that the second half of the sentence was
> restricting itself to a narrow definition of libraries.

Remember, the subject of the sentence is Scheme, not Racket.  Racket
is a lot better in this regard; for example, lists are immutable.
-- 
sam th
samth at ccs.neu.edu