[racket] [BULK] Fundamentals
As someone who doesn't know better, I like your post. Can you explain 'script' ?
rac
> The definitions are clear and have not changed. If you have a machine
> that runs programs written in language M, but you have a program
> written in language L, you can proceed in one of two ways:
>
> 1) You can modify the *machine* to run programs in a different language.
> An interpreter is a program that transforms a machine into
> another machine.
>
> 2) You can find an `equivalant' program in the language the machine does run.
> A compiler is a program that transforms a program into another program.
>
> Interpretation or compilation is a relationship between machines and programs.
> It isn't a property of the language. Shriram Krishnamurthi had the most correct
> response:
> The phrase "interpreted language" has no meaning; it's nonsensical.
>
> --
> ~jrm
>
> ** I suppose we could argue a little bit. If the notion of
> `equivalent program' were
> poorly defined, then you might find it very hard to write a compiler.
> (Or, having
> written one, determining if it works correctly.) It is possible to
> create a programming
> language that is so hard to statically analyze that the best you can do is
> to `inline the interpreter'. You might call such a language an
> `interpreted language'.
> Scheme and Racket, however, do not fall into this category.
> _________________________________________________
> For list-related administrative tasks:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users