[racket] Syntax-parse and error messages
On 10/13/2010 10:41 AM, Jens Axel Søgaard wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am experimenting with syntax-parse in order to generate precise
> error messages with a minimum of fuss. So far it looks very promising,
> but I have a few questions.
>
> Below I have systematically define syntax-classes for each
> non-terminal in the grammar of cas-cade-e expressions.
> I have used this grammar:
>
> ;;; SYNTAX
> ;;<cas-cad-e> ::= (cas-cad-e<val-expr> <case-clause> ...+)
> ;;<case-clause> ::= [(<datum> ...)<then-expr> ...+]
>
> Each syntax class is given a description, which is included in
> an error message, when some expression fails to parse (and
> it is expected to).
>
> To focus on the error messages I have removed the expansion.
> Below I have tried to test which error messages I got.
>
> For (casc) I get the correct error message, namely
> casc: expected<cas-cad-expr> of the form (cas-cad-e<value-expr>
> <case-clause> ...+) after 1 term in: (casc)
>
> For (casc #:foo) I expected the error:
> "casc: expected value-expr in: #:foo"
> but got "casc: expected expr in: #:foo".
> How do I make syntax-parse give the precise error?
syntax-parse considers "expr" the more precise error in this case, since
it occurs within the other syntax class (value-expr). I've considered
adding a "role" annotation to pattern variables, orthogonal to syntax
classes, that would let you express something like "expected expression
for the clause value". But I haven't added it yet.
In the meantime, you can make value-expr opaque (#:opaque), and that
should mask out the expr error.
> For (casc 3 [(4) ]) where the<then-expr> ...+ part is omitted
> I get the error message:
> ; casc: repetition constraint violated in: (casc 3 ((4)))
> It is of course correct that the "at least one" repitition contraint
> is violated,
> but how do I get syntax-parse to tell me, that it is due to a missing
> <then-expr> in a<case-clause>?
The generic error message "repetition constraint violated" has been
removed in recent versions of syntax-parse, BTW.
At the moment, the only way to customize the error message here is to use
((~between te:then-expr 1 +inf.0 #:name "result expression") ...)
or see the other options of ~between.
Ryan
> #lang racket
> (require
> racket/stxparam
> (for-syntax unstable/syntax ; for generate-temporary
> syntax/parse
> syntax/stx))
> ;;; SYNTAX
> ;;<cas-cad-e> ::= (cas-cad-e<val-expr> <case-clause> ...+)
> ;;<case-clause> ::= [(<datum> ...)<then-expr> ...+]
>
> (define-syntax-parameter break
> (λ (stx) (raise-syntax-error 'break "The keywork break was used of
> context." stx)))
>
> (define-syntax (casc stx)
> (define-syntax-class datum
> #:attributes (d)
> #:description "<datum> part of the literal list in a<case-clause>"
> (pattern d:expr))
> (define-syntax-class then-expr
> #:attributes (e)
> #:description "an expression part to be part of a<case-clause>"
> (pattern e:expr))
> (define-syntax-class case-clause
> #:attributes ((d 1) (te 1))
> #:description "<case-clause> of the form [(<datum> ...)<then-expr> ...+"
> (pattern [(d:datum ...) te:then-expr ...+]))
> (define-syntax-class value-expr
> #:attributes (e)
> #:description "value-expr"
> (pattern e:expr))
> (define-syntax-class cas-cad-expr
> #:attributes (ve (c 1) last-c)
> #:description "<cas-cad-expr> of the form (cas-cad-e<value-expr>
> <case-clause> ...+)"
> (pattern (_ ve:value-expr c:case-clause ... last-c:case-clause)))
> (syntax-parse stx
> [usage:cas-cad-expr
> #'42]))
>
> ;; Expressions that must signal an error
>
> (casc) ; correct error message
> ;(casc #:foo) ; I expected the error: "casc: expected value-expr
> ..." but got "expected expr ..."
> ;(casc 3 [(4) ]) ; casc: repetition constraint violated in: (casc 3 ((4)))
> ;(casc 3 [(4) 2 3] [3]) ; only 3 is red shouldn't that be [3] ?
>
>
> ;; And a legal expression
> (casc 3
> [(1) 'one]
> [(3) 'three])
>
> --
> Jens Axel Søgaard
> _________________________________________________
> For list-related administrative tasks:
> http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users