[racket] a little macro exercise

Can that mutation can be exposed by call/cc?

Robby

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 11:09 PM, Jay McCarthy <jay.mccarthy at gmail.com> wrote:
> Mutation that is invisible to the user is fine by me.
>
> Jay
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Oct 8, 2010, at 10:04 PM, Neil Van Dyke <neil at neilvandyke.org> wrote:
>
>> Jay McCarthy wrote at 10/08/2010 11:41 PM:
>>> I wrote mine without looking at Elis. I like his and mine better than the others. And obvs I like mine more. =P
>>>
>>
>> Mutation?! :)
>>
>> I suppose that these different solutions might hint at some of our varying styles or priorities.
>>
>> My use of "syntax-rules" was done as an exercise, or I probably would've used newer features and been more readable.  But, as a matter of current personal style, I still would've tried to avoid redundant tests and mutations in the generated code.
>>
>> --
>> http://www.neilvandyke.org/
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>