[racket] How can I measure time in nanoseconds?

From: Jay McCarthy (jay.mccarthy at gmail.com)
Date: Thu Nov 11 13:36:15 EST 2010

In case it is not clear Horace, because it is inexact, there are
numbers after the decimal, representing nanoseconds, etc.


On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> 30 minutes ago, Horace Dynamite wrote:
>> The closest approximation I can find in the documentation is
>> current-milliseconds? I require more accuracy in my project,
>> specifically, nanosecond accuracy. I do apologise if I've missed
>> this information in the documentation, if so can anyone point me to
>> the right place? Or recommend a method to obtain more accuracy?
> There's `current-inexact-milliseconds'.
> --
>          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users

Jay McCarthy <jay at cs.byu.edu>
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University

"The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93

Posted on the users mailing list.