[racket] How can I measure time in nanoseconds?

In case it is not clear Horace, because it is inexact, there are
numbers after the decimal, representing nanoseconds, etc.

Jay

On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 11:32 AM, Eli Barzilay <eli at barzilay.org> wrote:
> 30 minutes ago, Horace Dynamite wrote:
>> The closest approximation I can find in the documentation is
>> current-milliseconds? I require more accuracy in my project,
>> specifically, nanosecond accuracy. I do apologise if I've missed
>> this information in the documentation, if so can anyone point me to
>> the right place? Or recommend a method to obtain more accuracy?
>
> There's `current-inexact-milliseconds'.
>
> --
>          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>



-- 
Jay McCarthy <jay at cs.byu.edu>
Assistant Professor / Brigham Young University
http://faculty.cs.byu.edu/~jay

"The glory of God is Intelligence" - D&C 93