[racket] Fwd: Re: Loop in Racket

Thankyou for your responses re loop.

----- Forwarded message from brad at longbrothers.net -----
     Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2010 11:44:25 +1000
     From: Brad Long <brad at longbrothers.net>
Reply-To: Brad Long <brad at longbrothers.net>
  Subject: Re: [racket] Loop in Racket
       To: Robby Findler <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>

Wow! Sorry, didn't realise they existed. These constructs will assist
racket up-take. Cheers. Next time I'll RTFM.

Quoting Robby Findler <robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>:

> Please see 'for' in the docs. Here's the relevant section of the Guide:
>
> http://docs.racket-lang.org/guide/for.html
>
> Robby
>
> On Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 8:32 PM, Brad Long <brad at longbrothers.net> wrote:
>> Dear racketeers,
>>
>> What is the reason for not offering a looping construct in racket? For
>> example, something like:
>>
>> (loop (i 1 10) (print i))
>>
>> Just for the masses, it seems simpler to use.
>>
>> Any comments?
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>>  http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>>
>




----- End forwarded message -----