[plt-scheme] Suitability of typed scheme for replacement of c language for microcontrollers

On Sat, 2010-02-20 at 22:12 -0500, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
>  I wasn't thinking that 
> static typing is necessary, and I don't need "call/cc" directly, but I 
> am concerned about GC (its resource demands, and doing it with real-time 
> constraints).
There actually already exists scheme for PIC microcontrollers. 
http://repo.or.cz/w/picobit.git

The reason i was considering a typed scheme is that i have to program in
c anyways and a typed scheme wouldn't make much a difference except that
it could do macros - a big advantage - and it would have the same
potential for speed as c does.