[racket] Nested scope in D vs Racket

On Aug 21, Paul Ojanen wrote:
> I have been forced to learn the options of require due to naming
> conflicts.  Is this global masking not being allowed?  Or are my
> require conflicts problematic because my imported identifiers are
> coming in AT THE SAME LEVEL?  [...]

The latter -- requiring the same name twice is the same as defining it
twice in the same scope.

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                    http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!