From: Vincent St-Amour (stamourv at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Tue Aug 17 13:15:48 EDT 2010 |
|
At Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:03:49 -0400, Danny Yoo wrote: > I'm guessing that the type-checker has some hardcoded notion of the > types for racket/list functions. Is this true? Typed Racket provides typed bindings for most of the "racket" language. You can, as you did, require racket/X and this will import the typed bindings. Vincent
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|