[racket] Macros as a first class objects?

On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 02:25, Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk at cs.brown.edu>wrote:

> I think it's fairly safe to say that, at SOME point in his career,
> such an example just may possibly have stolen across Matthias's mind
> (-:.  You might learn more by thinking about why it is he rejected
> this option, than by trying to sell him on it.
>
> Shriram
>

I'm sure of that - that's exactly why I raised the question here, to guide
me to why it might be a bad idea.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20100815/8064f0a9/attachment.html>