[racket] Interesting article

Thank you. Yes you are right it is not in the core yet and its just
a third party library. But we would want like to move some of the 
more useful ones to the core. I didn't comment about it because 
I don't know what it would be eventually. So I stopped myself.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Shriram Krishnamurthi" <sk at cs.brown.edu>
To: "Hari Prashanth" <krhari at ccs.neu.edu>
Cc: "Eduardo Bellani" <ebellani at gmail.com>, "Racket mailing list" <users at racket-lang.org>
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2010 3:14:36 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket] Interesting article

Your library is truly impressive, but I don't think it addresses some
of the fundamental issues that the OP talks about (availability in the
core and not as some third-party library, integration with syntax,
good integration of laziness).  Maybe you could comment more
specifically, in case I've missed these issues from your
documentation.

Shriram