[racket] Functional mutators (was: syntax, differently)
On Aug 3, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Todd O'Bryan wrote:
>
> One thing that Scheme/Racket lacks is the wealth of stylistic advice
> that languages like C++, Java, Python, etc. have in abundance. Maybe
> it's because Schemers/Racketeers figure other people can figure out
> how to name their variables to keep the code well organized, but it
> just isn't so. :-)
Another view: we don't put people in chains.
But yes, we don't write such things and because of the liberal syntax
few are systematic enough.