[racket] syntax, differently

Pretty-print doesn't work all that well, when it gets close up against
the 80 column limit. At least, that's my experience reading its
output.

Robby

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:50 AM, Jos Koot <jos.koot at telefonica.net> wrote:
> pretty-print (with (pretty-print-columns 80))?
> jos
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: users-bounces at racket-lang.org
>> [mailto:users-bounces at racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Jos Koot
>> Sent: 02 August 2010 16:44
>> To: 'Robby Findler'; 'Horace Dynamite'
>> Cc: users at racket-lang.org
>> Subject: Re: [racket] syntax, differently
>>
>> WQhy would this be tricky?
>> Jos
>>
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: users-bounces at racket-lang.org
>> > [mailto:users-bounces at racket-lang.org] On Behalf Of Robby Findler
>> > Sent: 02 August 2010 16:34
>> > To: Horace Dynamite
>> > Cc: users at racket-lang.org
>> > Subject: Re: [racket] syntax, differently
>> >
>> > On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Horace Dynamite
>> > <horace.dynamite at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > > I
>> > > do wonder how tricky it will be do have a line-breaking
>> > routine that
>> > > can take as input the program I posted, and produce as output the
>> > > program you returned.
>> >
>> > That seems very tricky, at least to me.
>> >
>> > Robby
>> > _________________________________________________
>> >   For list-related administrative tasks:
>> >   http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>>
>>
>> _________________________________________________
>>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>>   http://lists.racket-lang.org/listinfo/users
>
>
>