From: Matthias Felleisen (matthias at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Wed Sep 9 15:51:28 EDT 2009 |
|
On Sep 9, 2009, at 3:33 PM, Shriram Krishnamurthi wrote: > I argued for the inclusion of ARITY on the grounds that some other > Scheme (Chez?) had it -- and I needed it for the first debugging > support code I wrote. We could ask Dan or Mitch, but I have the vague memory that even Scheme 84 allowed some arity inspection, and that this may have been derived from the implementation language (Franz).
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|