[plt-scheme] Questions on PLT status and project structure

No.


On Oct 15, 2009, at 9:41 AM, 元 wrote:

> The mutable pairs and lists work something like pointers in C,does   
> a mutable list works faster than a immutable one,generally?
>
>
> ------------------ Original ------------------
> From: "Neil Van Dyke"<neil at neilvandyke.org>;
> Date: 2009年10月15日(星期四) 下午4:13
> To: "Scott McLoughlin"<scott at adrenaline.com>; "PLT"<plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu 
> >;
> Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] Questions on PLT status and project  
> structure
>
> I've been involved in (what's now called) open source for a couple
> decades, and have been using PLT Scheme for close to 8 years.
>
> I think that PLT's development model has been working out very well.
>
> At this time, I have more confidence in the existing model than I  
> would
> in a divvying-up of pieces of PLT Scheme among some network of  
> community
> members.
>
> For random community members, like myself, writing PLaneT packages  
> is a
> no-brainer great way to contribute.  Bug reports and feature
> suggestions, and even small patches, too.
>
> Nothing precludes very smart community members someday taking up core
> PLT development, such as in the event of all existing PLT developers
> signing up to be astronauts on the Mars mission.  But until that  
> time, I
> wouldn't want PLT to mess too much with a winning formula.
>
> -- 
> http://www.neilvandyke.org/
>
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme