[plt-scheme] mathematicians lament

I have never seen any evidence for this. Not that it's a PLT topic. 



On Nov 19, 2009, at 11:50 AM, Martin DeMello wrote:

> Teenagers who know what they're doing are less likely to get pregnant :)
> 
> m.
> 
> On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:53 PM, michael rice <nowgate at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>> So, mandatory sex education should result in ... um, a lower birth rate?
>> 
>> Michael
>> 
>> --- On Thu, 11/19/09, Jon Rafkind <rafkind at cs.utah.edu> wrote:
>> 
>> From: Jon Rafkind <rafkind at cs.utah.edu>
>> Subject: [plt-scheme] mathematicians lament
>> To: "PLT-Scheme Mailing List" <plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu>
>> Date: Thursday, November 19, 2009, 10:28 AM
>> 
>> http://www.maa.org/devlin/LockhartsLament.pdf
>> 
>> This is a comment on the state of teaching mathematics. I'm not sure how old it is but a few parallels can probably be drawn to computer science (or maybe will be drawn in a few years). The first 3 pages are pretty amusing, at least.
>> _________________________________________________
>> For list-related administrative tasks:
>> http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>> 
>> 
>> _________________________________________________
>>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>> 
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme