[plt-scheme] PLT's version number rules

This is great - thanks Robby.

yc

On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 3:44 AM, Robby Findler
<robby at eecs.northwestern.edu>wrote:

> Check out the version/utils library.
>
> Robby
>
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 4:18 AM, YC <yinso.chen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all -
> >
> > I am wondering if anyone knows the rules governing the PLT's version
> > number?  I am interested in comparing and ordering PLT's version numbers.
> > Below are what I am aware of:
> >
> > before v4, the version numbers are a single integer (300 = version 3.0,
> 372
> > = version 3.72)
> > since v4, the version numbers are <major>.<minor>.<revision>, like 4.2.2,
> > where all are numbers; and presumably this will be the case for a while
> >
> > Are there other rules?  For example - what would be the rules for pre or
> svn
> > builds?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > yc
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________
> >  For list-related administrative tasks:
> >  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20091109/5b251583/attachment.html>