Computers obviously not harmful (was: Re: [plt-scheme] Computers considered harmful)
On May 8, 2009, at 11:45 AM, Noel Welsh wrote:
> On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 6:52 PM, John Clements <clements at brinckerhoff.org
> > wrote:
>> The bulk of my original posting was clearly garbage. The only
>> thing I think
>> is interesting (and I have nothing further to add at the moment) is
>> the
>> notion that using robots as the lead-in to CS education may lead to
>> a poor
>> mental model of computation in that it encourages the student to
>> think of
>> the computer as a large robot with many state variables (a.k.a. main
>> memory).
>
> Depends on the model you use to program the robot -- you can do nice
> FRP on robotics, for example. However, in most robotics courses you'll
> spend a lot of time wrestling with the failures of the hardware, which
> can obscure the main points in a CS introduction.
Ah! No! Finally something I can disagree with :). I claim you get
exactly the same problem using FRP. It looks like this:
The students work with FRP models, and learn how to control a robot by
defining behaviors as functions of state variables. When the students
move to general-purpose computing, they re-use this model, and imagine
a program as defining behaviors as functions of state variables; in
this case, though, the state variables are the cells of the memory.
To be somewhat more specific: imagine using an FRP model to program a
robot to add one to each element of a list: The robot's state would
probably include 'what element I'm visiting', and perhaps an 'add one'
operation. The point is that even a purely functional solution is
placed into a robot framework that turns it into a sequence of
mutations.
That's my thinking, anyhow.
John
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 2484 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20090508/27db7ae0/attachment.p7s>