[plt-scheme] Inlined language from a language module
Matthew Flatt wrote:
> The simplest way I can find to allow `with-mini' anywhere requires
>
> 1. An extra module.
>
> 2. A `replace-context' function instead of `strip-context'.
>
> The latter is a simple generalization of `strip-context', and I've
> added it to `syntax/strip-context' in SVN.
>
> ---- with-mini.ss ----------------------------------------
> #lang s-exp "with-mini-maker.ss"
> "mini.ss"
>
> ---- with-mini-maker.ss ----------------------------------
> #lang scheme
> (require (for-syntax syntax/strip-context))
>
> (provide (rename-out [module-begin #%module-begin]))
>
> (define-syntax (module-begin stx)
> (syntax-case stx ()
> [(_ req)
> #'(#%plain-module-begin
> (require req)
> (provide with-mini)
> (define-syntax (with-mini stx)
> (syntax-case stx ()
> [(_ expr)
> (replace-context #'req (strip-context #'expr))])))]))
>
> ---- example use of with-mini.ss -------------------------
> #lang scheme
> (require "with-mini.ss")
>
> (list (with-mini (1+ 0))
> (with-mini (1+ (1+ 0))))
I've attached my inline-language maker language module, stripped of
everything but essentials for my latest question.
It turns out that replace-context as it is doesn't play well with
unquoting. (I need to parameterize RevBayes code on Scheme values, and
unquoting is a nice way to do it.) My replacement,
replace-revbayes-context, works identically except it replaces
#'(unquote expr) with #'(unrevbayes expr) and doesn't recurse into #'expr.
I'm posting this because with the whole macro system at my disposal, it
seems weird that I'd need to do what is essentially a macro expansion
inside of replace-context. But I can't think of a simpler way to do it
that allows me to use comma syntax.
Neil
-------------- next part --------------
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: revbayes-inline-maker-essential.ss
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20090325/2192fdca/attachment.ksh>