[plt-scheme] Re: Should PLT Scheme have two R6RS namespaces?

On Mar 23, detmammut at googlemail.com wrote:
> I had a discussion with eli on this allready in IRC. The problem is
> not so much that these R6RS replacements are not available*, but
> that someone has to step up to provide test-cases and support. I'll
> have a week or two a free time starting april so I will port (the
> testcases for) srfi-1 (unless someone else is faster :)
> 
> * see https://code.launchpad.net/~ikarus-libraries-team/ikarus-libraries/srfi

What I also said is that dragging a big piece of code like that,
rather than adapting existing code, is very problematic.

-- 
          ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
                  http://www.barzilay.org/                 Maze is Life!