From: Shriram Krishnamurthi (sk at cs.brown.edu) Date: Sat Mar 7 20:20:11 EST 2009 |
|
> Multiple Scheme products would be great. Really? We've had "multiple Scheme products" for decades now. And the evidence of greatness is...? In contrast, many languages have gotten by with one or two implementations. And it has hurt them how? [Sorry, irrespective of my own beliefs about how many Scheme implementations is ideal, I could not allow such a blandly grandiose remark go unchallenged.] Shriram
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|