[plt-scheme] Re: Nanojit - an alternative to LLVM

Ditto, though when I coincidentally said this two days ago to a
systems person I respect greatly, he said, "Oh no, it's different now"
-- and he's not even a part of the project or some other kind of
booster.  So maybe something is changing in Parrot-space.

Shriram

On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 4:05 PM, Jakub Piotr Cłapa<jpc-ml at zenburn.net> wrote:
> On 6/18/09 7:59 PM, Robert wrote:
>>
>> Parrot has been getting a lot of attention lately. What is your take
>> on using that for PLT?
>
> AFAIK it's getting a lot of attention for at least several years now and it
> still does not offer anything usable.
>
> --
> regards,
> Jakub Piotr Cłapa
> _________________________________________________
>  For list-related administrative tasks:
>  http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme
>