From: Neil Van Dyke (neil at neilvandyke.org) Date: Fri Jun 12 17:04:07 EDT 2009 |
|
namekuseijin wrote at 06/12/2009 04:47 PM: > Fact is: do *is* named let, only more convenient and a bit more limited. > I disagree. People are free to use "do", just as people are free to eat paste, but neither practice should be advocated . -- http://www.neilvandyke.org/
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|