From: Jon Rafkind (rafkind at cs.utah.edu) Date: Fri Jun 12 02:09:26 EDT 2009 |
|
Captain___nemo wrote: > Thanks a lot :) > > Won't it be inefficient building list for large values (say thousands > instead of 10)? Isn't there any direct loop syntax in Scheme? > > Oh yea I guess you can use the for stuff that I keep forgetting about. (for ((i (in-range 0 10))) (for ((j (in-range 0 3))) (printf "~a\n" j)) (printf "~a\n" i))
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|