| From: David Van Horn (dvanhorn at ccs.neu.edu) Date: Mon Jul 20 14:40:34 EDT 2009 |
|
Carl Eastlund wrote: > What you wrote was a perfectly acceptable contract that functioned > perfectly, except that it wasn't the one you meant it to be. What > alternate behavior would you propose? Actually, Paulo broke the contract on or/c, so this could have a better error message without changes to the contract language. David
| Posted on the users mailing list. |
|
![[logo]](/logo.png){kind=logo}