From: Paulo J. Matos (pocmatos at gmail.com) Date: Mon Jul 20 14:33:24 EDT 2009 |
|
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Carl Eastlund<carl.eastlund at gmail.com> wrote: > > What you wrote was a perfectly acceptable contract that functioned > perfectly, except that it wasn't the one you meant it to be. What > alternate behavior would you propose? > > --Carl > Now you got me. Why is #f in the error message? -- Paulo Jorge Matos - pocmatos at gmail.com http://www.pmatos.net
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|