[plt-scheme] Defining a transformation time path, or setting module-language to something useful

Hello,

I believe the best temporary solution for my current problem is to use eval in the scheme/base language module from within the definitions window. I do not know if this is the unimplemented functionality that you have alluded to in the previous message re-listed below, but if it is I would like to know when it will be a part of a stable release. It is not an ideal solution for my problem because I could do better with macros, but I am still learning and this would be expedient for my purposes.

Thanks,

-Zelah

> -----Original Message-----
> From: eli at barzilay.org
> Sent: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 12:43:11 -0400
> To: noelwelsh at gmail.com, plt-scheme at list.cs.brown.edu
> Subject: Re: [plt-scheme] Defining a transformation time path, or setting
> module-language to something useful
> 
> On Jun 24, Eli Barzilay wrote:
>> [...]
>> But I see now that it doesn't work with "#lang at-exp scheme/base",
>> and it should.  I'll try to look into it soon.
> 
> I forgot to send a followup on this -- the `at-exp' reader is still
> written manually, not with `module/syntax-reader' -- since I didn't
> get to implement languages that chain to other languages yet.
> 
> Anyway, did you use any of this?
> 
> --
>           ((lambda (x) (x x)) (lambda (x) (x x)))          Eli Barzilay:
>                     http://barzilay.org/                   Maze is Life!
> _________________________________________________
>   For list-related administrative tasks:
>   http://list.cs.brown.edu/mailman/listinfo/plt-scheme