[plt-scheme] Functional Abstraction in Java
Ha! :)
In reality, I'm not sure I know what the spirit of OOP really is,
except that it must contain a heavy dose of FP (given Kay's comments),
so passing around what are really little functions should be at least
close.
Robby
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:27 PM, Matthias Felleisen<matthias at ccs.neu.edu> wrote:
>
> Ah, I agree with you actually, which is why I weasled in the letter "L" into
> my sentence. And HtCH says so!
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 1, 2009, at 2:17 PM, Robby Findler wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Matthias Felleisen<matthias at ccs.neu.edu>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I consider both solutions in the spirit of OOPLs. -- Matthias
>>
>> Sorry -- didn't mean to imply that one wasn't in the spirit of OOP;
>> bad wording choice on my part.
>>
>> Robby
>
>