From: Grant Rettke (grettke at acm.org) Date: Thu Jan 15 06:05:45 EST 2009 |
|
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 3:30 AM, Sigrid Keydana <keydana at gmx.de> wrote: > I just wonder why [local is] necessary (or even "nice-to-have") - why not simply use > let or letrec? The documentation for it says: "Like letrec, except that the bindings are expressed in the same way as in the top-level or in a module body: using define, define-values, define-syntax, define-struct, etc." So to Thomas's point, it seems like it is a matter of personal taste.
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|