From: Grant Rettke (grettke at acm.org) Date: Tue Jan 6 21:36:28 EST 2009 |
|
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 5:18 PM, John Clements <clements at brinckerhoff.org> wrote: > Yes, that's gross. On the other hand, I find that when writing Scheme these > days, using mutation gives me the willies; it seems less error-prone to use > a state monad, where I don't have to worry about other bits of the > computation coming in and messing up the state. Please elaborate on how you use the state monad in Scheme.
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|