From: Neil Van Dyke (neil at neilvandyke.org) Date: Sat Feb 28 23:19:37 EST 2009 |
|
Carl Eastlund wrote at 02/28/2009 09:59 PM: > If S is instead defined as a transformer function and later required > for-syntax somewhere else, you should require PM for-template wherever > that transformer function is. > Thank you. That's what I assumed, but it wasn't working when I left this code in 372. "for-template" should be exactly what I need. Neil
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|