[plt-scheme] Scheme Steering Committee Position Statement

Do you not see the things mentioned as part of the PLT Scheme language
proper or that they don't amount to a large language? Just looking for a
clarification.

On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 2:25 PM, Karl Winterling <kwinterling at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 1:15 PM, Doug
> Williams<m.douglas.williams at gmail.com> wrote:
> > As a developer, I definitely see PLT Scheme as a large language.
>
> Speaking as a (l)user with rather idiosyncratic programming habits, I
> respectfully disagree :-).
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20090821/42f85b40/attachment.html>