[plt-scheme] *const

Oh, sorry, me and some person on the list named Danny forgot to cc our
conversation the other day to the list. Danny wrote:

2009/4/3 Danny Yoo <dyoo at cs.wpi.edu>

> On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Jon Loldrup <loldrup at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm working through The Little Schemer and I've comed to the point where
> > they introduce types (page 181). They use terms like:
>
> Keep going a few more pages.  The book's dialogue turns toward what
> shape the actions need to have.  After that, it finally starts
> introducing those definitions on Page 183.
>

To which I replied:
Ahh - smart :)


Jon Loldrup


2009/4/5 Matthias Felleisen <matthias at ccs.neu.edu>

>
> On Apr 5, 2009, at 3:45 PM, David Van Horn wrote:
>
> Thanks for looking it up.
>
>
>  Rereading this part of TLS, I can only conclude that this was written
>> before Matthias visited the pope.
>>
>
> I suspect you're wrong. Again no where close to a book, but look at the
> copy right.
>
> ;; ---
>
> The exercise in 10 is quite interesting in some strange way. Get the
> interpreter to work in the language of the book so that it behaves just like
> the book, regardless of which Scheme you run in. (There was some silly
> nil-#f issue in the air back then ... another one of those discussions on
> 'standards' that generated a lot of heat.)
>
> -- Matthias
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.racket-lang.org/users/archive/attachments/20090405/f781ff56/attachment.html>