From: Grant Rettke (grettke at acm.org) Date: Fri Sep 12 20:38:41 EDT 2008 |
|
Hi, Was sub-chapter 7.5 a point of contention? I like contracts, but it doesn't feel like it fits. Evidence: * Less than 3 pages * We are encouraged to raise errors, but we haven't got a unit-testing tool to actually check if they were raised. I argued that the goal is to show that we grok how to provide checked versions of our functions to clients, so function documentation and unit tests aren't required here. Best wishes, Grant
Posted on the users mailing list. |
|