[plt-scheme] Re: PLT R6RS questions and answers

Alex Shinn wrote:
<snip>
 > This is obviously a rough graph and the distances are
 > debatable - it's my own view of things skewed quite heavily
 > by the experience I've had writing portable R5RS libraries.

Just curious, what is your vision on the future of "Programming
Language Scheme" ? Is there any chance to make it real-world PL ?
Do you think that current state of standardization is acceptable ?
If not, what would you propose to improve it ?

-- 
Bohdan