[plt-scheme] Mutable and immutable pairs in PLT Scheme

At Tue, 25 Nov 2008 23:28:16 -0500, Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:
> So, I was surprised when I saw that Matthew picked interoperability
> with code that uses set-car!/set-cdr! (very little importance IMHO)
> over interoperability with the rest of the PLT code base.

I imagined that users would be too unhappy with that level of
non-conformance, but it sounds like I may have been wrong.

Does anyone here want PLT Scheme's R6RS support to include `(rnrs
mutable-pairs)'? If I hear no objections, we'll just get rid of it.


Matthew